Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (2.13 vs 1.27, Δ 0.86).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (19 vs 6 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 2.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 357 | Accurate passes | 432Lead |
| 431 | Total passes | 505Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |