Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 1.35, Δ 0.43).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Seattle Sounders |
|---|---|---|
| 1.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Seattle Sounders |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 373 | Total passes | 501Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Seattle Sounders |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Seattle Sounders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Seattle Sounders |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |