Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 0.73, Δ 0.38).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 405Lead |
| 413 | Total passes | 495Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |