Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (1.95 vs 2.01, Δ 0.06).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Portland Timbers held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.01Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 441Lead | Accurate passes | 232 |
| 524Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.