Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 0.45, Δ 0.65).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 481Lead | Accurate passes | 321 |
| 560Lead | Total passes | 403 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.37 | Goals prevented | -0.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.