Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 0.99, Δ 0.50).
- Portsmouth fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 161Lead | Accurate passes | 121 |
| 222Lead | Total passes | 185 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.18 | Goals prevented | -0.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |