Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Portsmouth was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
- Reading held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 324 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |