Match statistics snapshot
- Portsmouth created the clearer chances on xG (2.36 vs 2.03, Δ 0.33).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 27%).
- Portsmouth held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.03 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 176 |
| 482Lead | Total passes | 276 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portsmouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.