Match statistics snapshot
- CFRJ / Maricá created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 1.14, Δ 0.36).
- CFRJ / Maricá fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- Portuguesa RJ was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portuguesa Rj | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portuguesa Rj | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 245 | Total passes | 454Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portuguesa Rj | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portuguesa Rj | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portuguesa Rj | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |