Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 1.40, Δ 0.63).
- QPR fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Preston | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.40Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Preston | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 369Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 459Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Preston | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Preston | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.72 | Goals prevented | -0.72 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Preston | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |