Match statistics snapshot
- Progreso fired more attempts (7 vs 5 shots).
- Racing Montevideo was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 71%).
- Progreso held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Progreso | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
| Shots off target |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Progreso | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Progreso | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Progreso | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Progreso | Statistic | Racing Montevideo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |