Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 17%).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Puebla | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Puebla | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 303 | Accurate passes | 460Lead |
| 359 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Puebla | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Puebla | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Puebla | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |