Match statistics snapshot
- Puerto Cabello fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 17%).
- Sao Paulo held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Puerto Cabello | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Puerto Cabello | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 503Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 569Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Puerto Cabello | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Puerto Cabello | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Puerto Cabello | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |