Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 1.41, Δ 0.68).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pyramids Fc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.41Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pyramids Fc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 264Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 343Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pyramids Fc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pyramids Fc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.25 | Goals prevented | -1.25 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pyramids Fc | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.