Match statistics snapshot
- Qarabag created the clearer chances on xG (1.63 vs 1.26, Δ 0.37).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Qarabag was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qarabag | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qarabag | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 436Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 498Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qarabag | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qarabag | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.24 | Goals prevented | -0.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qarabag | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.