Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 2.06, Δ 0.85).
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Chengdu Better City was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.06Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 229 | Accurate passes | 427Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 499Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.