Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 1.92, Δ 0.80).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Qingdao Jonoon was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.92Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 7 | Shots off target | 7 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 166 | Accurate passes | 548Lead |
| 250 | Total passes | 621Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.