Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (0.27 vs 1.79, Δ 1.52).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.79Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 451Lead | Accurate passes | 447 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 523 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |