Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (1.98 vs 2.35, Δ 0.37).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.35Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 365Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 445Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.