Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 2.30, Δ 1.19).
- Qingdao Jonoon fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.30Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 323 | Accurate passes | 497Lead |
| 395 | Total passes | 583Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.