Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 3.35, Δ 1.87).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (24 vs 11 shots).
- Qingdao Jonoon was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.35Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 662Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 716Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.