Match statistics snapshot
- Qingdao Jonoon created the clearer chances on xG (3.47 vs 2.29, Δ 1.18).
- Qingdao Jonoon fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 3.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.29 |
| 5Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 378Lead | Accurate passes | 337 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 417 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |