Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 2.37, Δ 0.41).
- Tianjin Teda fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.37Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 388 | Total passes | 465Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.