Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
- Wuhan Three Towns held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 369Lead |
| 314 | Total passes | 466Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Jonoon | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.