Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (0.21 vs 2.09, Δ 1.88).
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (10 vs 3 shots).
- Chengdu Better City was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.09Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 354Lead | Accurate passes | 248 |
| 426Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |