Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (23 vs 9 shots).
- Qingdao Youth Island was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 43%).
- Wuhan Three Towns held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 348Lead |
| 376 | Total passes | 418Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 11Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qingdao Youth Island | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |