Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (1.72 vs 0.92, Δ 0.80).
- QPR fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 347Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 433Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |