Match statistics snapshot
- Bristol City created the clearer chances on xG (0.38 vs 0.44, Δ 0.06).
- Bristol City was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Bristol City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.38 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Bristol City |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 424 | Accurate passes | 436Lead |
| 505 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Bristol City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Bristol City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Bristol City |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.