Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 0.52, Δ 0.09).
- Cardiff fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Cardiff was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.52 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 434Lead | Accurate passes | 207 |
| 537Lead | Total passes | 305 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |