Match statistics snapshot
- Coventry created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 1.47, Δ 0.54).
- Coventry fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Coventry was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.47Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 346Lead | Accurate passes | 314 |
| 420Lead | Total passes | 393 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |