Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Crystal Palace held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 348 | Accurate passes | 508Lead |
| 433 | Total passes | 582Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |