Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (0.37 vs 1.91, Δ 1.54).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.91Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 63%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 215Lead | Accurate passes | 182 |
| 339Lead | Total passes | 299 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.