Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (1.30 vs 1.34, Δ 0.04).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 201 | Accurate passes | 390Lead |
| 300 | Total passes | 488Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.