Match statistics snapshot
- Leeds created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 1.01, Δ 0.29).
- Leeds fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 255 | Accurate passes | 465Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 546Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |