Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 0.09, Δ 0.59).
- QPR fired more attempts (11 vs 4 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Oxford United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.09 |
| Offsides | ||
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Oxford United |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 289 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 373 | Total passes | 570Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Oxford United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Oxford United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.50 | Goals prevented | -0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Oxford United |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |