Match statistics snapshot
- Portsmouth created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 1.43, Δ 0.57).
- QPR fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 50% |
| 369Lead | Accurate passes | 139 |
| 511Lead | Total passes | 278 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.27 | Goals prevented | 0.27 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |