Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (1.69 vs 1.63, Δ 0.06).
- Portsmouth fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (89% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 1.69Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.63 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 187 | Accurate passes | 295Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 390Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -3.22 | Goals prevented | -3.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.