Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (1.84 vs 0.59, Δ 1.25).
- QPR fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 1.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 287Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 412Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |