Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (1.95 vs 0.23, Δ 1.72).
- QPR fired more attempts (17 vs 2 shots).
- Preston was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 1.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.23 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 403Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 487Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.02 | Goals prevented | -0.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |