Match statistics snapshot
- QPR fired more attempts (11 vs 4 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- QPR held more of the ball (53% possession).
Qpr vs Reading
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
| 11Lead | Total shots | 4 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 272Lead | Accurate passes | 222 |
| 362Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |