Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 0.93, Δ 0.21).
- QPR fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 399Lead | Accurate passes | 192 |
| 479Lead | Total passes | 270 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |