Match statistics snapshot
- Southampton created the clearer chances on xG (0.37 vs 1.58, Δ 1.21).
- Southampton fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Southampton was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 0.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 306 | Accurate passes | 546Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 610Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |