Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (2.36 vs 0.93, Δ 1.43).
- QPR fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 2.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 264 | Accurate passes | 267Lead |
| 354 | Total passes | 370Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |