Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (2.27 vs 1.19, Δ 1.08).
- QPR fired more attempts (23 vs 9 shots).
- Stoke City was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 2.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 377 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.50 | Goals prevented | -0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.