Match statistics snapshot
- Sunderland created the clearer chances on xG (0.30 vs 2.42, Δ 2.12).
- Sunderland fired more attempts (22 vs 5 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 0.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.42Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 156 | Accurate passes | 566Lead |
| 238 | Total passes | 637Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.