Match statistics snapshot
- Swansea created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 2.61, Δ 1.06).
- Swansea fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Swansea was more accurate in front of goal (65% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Qpr | Statistic | Swansea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.61Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Qpr | Statistic | Swansea |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 432 | Accurate passes | 474Lead |
| 519 | Total passes | 561Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Qpr | Statistic | Swansea |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Qpr | Statistic | Swansea |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Qpr | Statistic | Swansea |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |