Match statistics snapshot
- Quevilly fired more attempts (4 vs 3 shots).
- Ajaccio was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 50%).
- Quevilly held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 2Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 438Lead | Accurate passes | 249 |
| 541Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |