Match statistics snapshot
- Quevilly fired more attempts (23 vs 9 shots).
- Concarneau was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target |
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 381Lead |
| 430 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Concarneau |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |