Match statistics snapshot
- Quick Boys fired more attempts (19 vs 16 shots).
- Quick Boys was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 38%).
- Heerenveen held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Quick Boys | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Quick Boys | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 490Lead |
| 398 | Total passes | 640Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Quick Boys | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Quick Boys | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Quick Boys | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.