Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Racing Club was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 20%).
- Racing Club held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 392Lead | Accurate passes | 201 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 282 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Racing Club | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.